Varenicline vs nicotine patches: heart attack and stroke risks similar – UNSW Newsroom

Varenicline vs nicotine patches: heart attack and stroke risks similar – UNSW Newsroom

Smoking cessation medicines varenicline and nicotine patches present similar risks of major cardiovascular events like heart attack and stroke, a big data study published today in JAMA Network Open shows.

The study has implications for clinical practice and, in the long term, could contribute to lower smoking rates.

The research team used data of just over 200,000 Australians in NSW who were using either of the two most popular quit smoking medicines between 2011 and 2015.

“We did this study because there have previously been some concerns about the cardiovascular safety of quit smoking medicines,” says lead author Dr Alys Havard from UNSW Sydney’s National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC) and the Centre for Big Data Research in Health.

“It’s now generally accepted that if there is any cardiovascular risk associated with the use of quit smoking medicines, it’s outweighed by benefits of quitting smoking. So really, these medicines should be offered to anyone who wants to quit. But even so, it’s helpful for prescribers to know whether one is safer than another so they can minimise risk to their patients.”

In this study, the researchers compared the risk of major cardiovascular events in people who were using varenicline with people who chose nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) patches.

“We found that there was no difference between varenicline and NRT in terms of major events like heart attacks and stroke,” Dr Havard says.

“The risk of death from cardiovascular causes was actually slightly reduced among people using varenicline compared to those using NRT – albeit small in absolute magnitude (1.5 fewer cardiovascular deaths per 1000 person years).

“We know that varenicline is the most effective of the smoking pharmacotherapies – so our results suggest that prescribers can choose that one over nicotine and not worry about increasing patients’ risk of major cardiovascular outcomes.”

This is the first time that varenicline and NRT have been compared in terms of cardiovascular outcomes while patients were using therapy.

“Researchers have looked at longer term effects in other studies, but that’s not so much about safety – that’s more about whether the medicine helped someone to quit, and then what kind of health outcomes you have from that,” Dr Havard says.

Varenicline worries ‘put to bed’

Dr Havard says there have been concerns about varenicline having psychiatric side effects.

“But other evidence has pretty much put that to bed now. There have been a number of trials and similar work to this using routinely collected data sets that show that varenicline doesn’t increase the risk of psychiatric side effects. But I think that’s always meant that people have thought of it as not the safest option.

“With nicotine, it’s seen as just a replacement for the smoking – there’s this perception that if anything, you’re taking away some of the toxins that are associated with smoking, so it’s always been thought to be quite safe in comparison.

“So it’s interesting to see that actually, varenicline is no worse, and in some cases may be better for some outcomes.”

Study limitations unlikely to change conclusions

Dr Havard says while they tried to account for every …….

Source: https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/health/varenicline-vs-nicotine-patches-heart-attack-and-stroke-risks-similar

Quit smoking